Try as I might, and no matter how hard I try to ignore celebrity trash like the whole Kardashian family, daughter Kim has intruded on my day once again - this time as I innocently (I swear, it's true) searched the web for the latest book news, I inadvertently clicked on a page that had a headline about what some are calling a new "book."
Seems like the woman (I started to say "lady" but just about gagged at the thought of associating that word with this... person) has a new "book" out. Appropriately enough, the book is titled Selfish. And get this, it's nothing but a compilation of this airhead's favorite SELFIES. I kid you not.
So...as the title to this post says, "I'd sooner flush a fifty down the toilet" than even glance at garbage like this.
Now, though, I'm off to grab lunch, during which I hope to flush the Kardashian kids and their ever so weird parents from my mind for as long as possible.
A nineteen-year-old book blog offering book reviews and news about authors, publishers, bookstores, and libraries.
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World
Digital reading, via such electronic reading devices as the
Nook, the Kindle, and the recently departed Sony Reader, has been around long
enough now that its side-effects are starting to be measured and
discussed. The root question regarding
digital reading explored by Naomi S. Baron in Words Onscreen is one of whether or not “digital reading is
reshaping our very understanding of what it means to read.” Readers of Words Onscreen, if they had not already reached that conclusion
before beginning the book, are likely to come away from a reading of it with a
resounding “yes” in answer to the author’s question.
Few would argue that reading a book on a Kindle provides the
same experience as reading that same book in its physical form. Each format has its own set of distinct
characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages and, largely depending on
personal preferences, each format attracts strong advocates – and equally
strong critics. Naomi Baron, by
exploring those advantages, disadvantages, and related characteristics in
detail, explains why that is and why it is unlikely to change. If not always surprising, what Baron learns
in her study of digital reading (and digital readers) is always thought provoking enough to steer the reader toward self-examination
of his own feelings about the electronic reading process and environment.
![]() |
| Naomi S. Baron |
Baron begins with the premise that digital reading is
suitable for shorter pieces of light content, the kind of thing the reader neither
intends to analyze nor to reread. At the
same time, she states that digital reading is not at all suited for reading
most long works or works of any
length that require “serious thought” on the part of the reader. Does this mean that, as the prevalence of digital
reading continues to increase, certain types of reading will be abandoned by
even the most serious of readers? Baron,
in her chapter detailing the ever-increasing adoption of digital textbooks by
American colleges, argues that this might just be the case. And that shift in focus and ability to deeply
study a text, she argues, will have detrimental effects on all of our futures.
Words Onscreen
explores these and many other issues related to America, Canada, and Britain’s
eager (although the pace has slowed in recent months) adoption of digital
reading. Interestingly, for a variety
of reasons, some of which are financial and some cultural, the rest of the
world has not moved toward digital reading nearly as enthusiastically as have
these three countries. Even more
interesting, because it seems to defy common sense, is the discovery that much
of the resistance toward digital reading comes from readers in their twenties
and younger. One would have expected such
resistance to come almost exclusively from older, more tradition-oriented,
readers. That this is not the case,
however, is only one of the surprises to be found in Words Onscreen.
Side Note: I read Words Onscreen in digital form and, as
a result, while reading it I experienced firsthand some of what Baron describes
in the book. I have found, however, that
as I gain experience in reading e-books, I am beginning to overcome some of the
limitations inherent to digital reading.
Labels:
Reviews
Book Chase Is Eight Years Old
![]() |
| Your Brain on Books |
Despite the forced pause that I suffered through during parts of 2013 and 2014, Book Chase officially turns eight years old today. (Believe me...it was touch and go there for a while last year.) I'm happy to report that most of my "regulars" have found their way back to Book Chase and that my total readership, encouragingly, is on the rise. I thank all of you for the great welcome back to the world of book blogging I received when I was finally able to return. You guys (and, of course, your blogs) are amazing.
Eight, slightly interrupted, years of Book Chase means:
923 Book and Short Story Reviews
155 Posts on Bookstores
236 Posts on specific Authors
477 Posts of Book News
219 Links to book-related YouTube videos
39 Links to Book Trailer videos
112 Posts about E-book issues
58 Posts about avid Readers
In total, there have been almost 2,350 separate posts generating just under 11,000 comments, so thanks for the wonderful feedback. That number does not include the spam comments that I continue to deal with here. That's a whole other story.
The Top Ten Search Terms Leading to Book Chase (remember this goes back to January 2007) :
sarah's key
sarahs key
book rating system
british library
lynndie england
pride and prejudice and zombies
juliet hulme
porno (because I reviewed a book titled Johnny Porno)
ann perry
book chase blog
Countries in which Book Chase Is Most Read:
United States
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Canada
France
Germany
Russia
Australia
Poland
Ukraine
So now with eight years on the books, I'm looking forward to an uninterrupted ninth year. My goals for 2015 are simple ones: something close to averaging at least one post a day, more features on avid readers, at least two book reviews per week, regular Short Story Saturdays, and becoming part of the conversation on other book blogs as often as I can.
Thanks again to all of you who make this so much fun.
Labels:
Blog News
Monday, January 19, 2015
The Boy Who Did NOT Come Back From Heaven
17-year-old Alex Malarkey is one tough kid, and he's been through a lot in his short life. Alex suffered paralyzing injuries in a car wreck when he was just six years old and lives with the severe consequences of that accident to this day.
And now, Alex and his mother are trying to correct a mistake in judgement that Alex made about five years ago when he and his family allowed a book about his supposed visit to heaven to be published. In that book, The Boy Who Came Back from Heaven, Alex claims to have visited heaven where he saw angels firsthand and even heard the voice of God. But last Tuesday, in an open letter aimed especially at retailers of religious books, Alex calls himself "the boy who did not come back from heaven" and had this to say:
Beth Malarkey is concerned that the book continues to sell well (over a million copies have been sold at last count) and that no one ever questions its validity. On Saturday (January 15) on her personal blog, "Life's a Journey," she had this to say:
This kind of thing, when it is marketed as fiction (such as with Mitch Albon's The Five People You Meet in Heaven and For One More Day), can be inspirational to people looking for that kind of positive message. But publishers and movie studios cross to the wrong side of an ethical line when they represent something like young Malarkey's story as nonfiction - even if they do it as subtly as possible for legal reasons.
To its credit, Tyndale House, the book's publisher is taking The Boy Who Came Back from Heaven and any products associated with it out of print immediately. Some (such as Alex and his mother), however, might say that it's a little late...
And now, Alex and his mother are trying to correct a mistake in judgement that Alex made about five years ago when he and his family allowed a book about his supposed visit to heaven to be published. In that book, The Boy Who Came Back from Heaven, Alex claims to have visited heaven where he saw angels firsthand and even heard the voice of God. But last Tuesday, in an open letter aimed especially at retailers of religious books, Alex calls himself "the boy who did not come back from heaven" and had this to say:
The kid was obviously influenced by someone who saw the chance to profit from the story or, perhaps, to pay off the huge medical costs associated with the aftermath of the car accident. The book deal was signed only by Kevin Malarkey (the boy's father), and neither Alex nor his mother are parties to that contract. The Malarkeys have been divorced for approximately three years, and Beth makes it clear that the bulk of the money earned has not gone to Alex directly or toward his continuing care.“Please forgive the brevity, but because of my limitations I have to keep this short. I did not die. I did not go to Heaven. I said I went to heaven because I thought it would get me attention. When I made the claims that I did, I had never read the Bible. People have profited from lies, and continue to. They should read the Bible, which is enough. The Bible is the only source of truth. Anything written by man cannot be infallible.”
Beth Malarkey is concerned that the book continues to sell well (over a million copies have been sold at last count) and that no one ever questions its validity. On Saturday (January 15) on her personal blog, "Life's a Journey," she had this to say:
For at least three years, my son Alex Malarkey has been speaking the truth and pleading to be heard regarding The Boy Who Came Back from Heaven. I’m thankful to the Pulpit and Pen blog for posting Alex’s open letter last week and finally helping his voice to be heard. The sudden interest of the media has meant that many reporters are seeking to investigate the story and I would love to answer every question, but since 2006, I have been Alex’s only nonstop caregiver, and I also have three more precious children to care for. So I’m forced to say no to all interview requests. I hope people understand. The facts of the case are being heard, through sources like the Pulpit & Pen website (http://pulpitandpen.org/) and the Grace to You blog (http://www.gty.org/Blog/B150116/setting-the-record-straight).The Boy Who Came Back from Heaven is, unfortunately, not the only book of this type to rake in bundles of money for its "author" and others associated with marketing such malarkey (pun intended). There is, for example, the case of the recent movie, Heaven Is for Real, based on a book by yet another child who claims to have spent a few minutes on a personal tour of heaven.
This kind of thing, when it is marketed as fiction (such as with Mitch Albon's The Five People You Meet in Heaven and For One More Day), can be inspirational to people looking for that kind of positive message. But publishers and movie studios cross to the wrong side of an ethical line when they represent something like young Malarkey's story as nonfiction - even if they do it as subtly as possible for legal reasons.
To its credit, Tyndale House, the book's publisher is taking The Boy Who Came Back from Heaven and any products associated with it out of print immediately. Some (such as Alex and his mother), however, might say that it's a little late...
Labels:
Book News
Sunday, January 18, 2015
Harry Bosch Comes to Video Thanks to Amazon Prime
Rejoice, Michael Connelly fans, because Amazon Prime Instant Video has a treat for you on February 13: a full season of Harry Bosch cases to be released all at the same time. Feel free to binge-view your way to happiness.
Here's the official trailer that Amazon is using to whet the appetites of its Amazon Prime customers:
Readers of the Harry Bosch books will probably recognize that most of this trailer seems to be from Connelly's City of Bones (a book I reviewed here on November 23, 2009, if you're interested in learning more about it). This is Harry Bosch at the tail end of his career; he is in his sixties and has been relegated to working cold cases for the LAPD, a job he comes to relish. I am looking forward to the series with high hope that it matches the intensity of Michael Connelly's novels...we'll see.
Here's the official trailer that Amazon is using to whet the appetites of its Amazon Prime customers:
Readers of the Harry Bosch books will probably recognize that most of this trailer seems to be from Connelly's City of Bones (a book I reviewed here on November 23, 2009, if you're interested in learning more about it). This is Harry Bosch at the tail end of his career; he is in his sixties and has been relegated to working cold cases for the LAPD, a job he comes to relish. I am looking forward to the series with high hope that it matches the intensity of Michael Connelly's novels...we'll see.
Labels:
Book Trailers,
YouTube
Saturday, January 17, 2015
Short Story Saturday: W.P. Kinsella's "The Night Manny Mota Tied the Record"
I will be forever grateful to W.P. Kinsella even if he never publishes another single word because he is responsible for one of my favorite books of all-time, Shoeless Joe. That novel, of course, subsequently morphed into what is one of my favorite movies of all-time: Field of Dreams. And now I find out that the novel itself was preceded by a short story titled "Shoeless Joe Comes to Iowa." I only recently learned about the short story because it is included in a brand new collection of twenty-seven Kinsella short stories (The Essential W.P. Kinsella) that I've been reading.
W.P. Kinsella may be Canadian but his love for, and deep understanding of, the game of baseball are second to none. Kinsella is the ultimate fan, a man who appreciates the game within the game of baseball even more than what the box score reveals to the game's more casual fans. Although not all of his stories are about baseball, it is baseball stories for which Kinsella is best known in this country, and I've selected one of my favorites of those for "Short Story Saturday."
"The Night Manny Mota Tied the Record" takes place in Dodger Stadium on August 7, 1979 during a game between the Los Angeles Dodgers and the Houston Astros. During that game, one fan, without once leaving his seat, is going to have an experience that will change him forever. An old man takes the seat next to our fan and begins talking about the funeral of Yankee catcher Thurman Munson who had died just five days earlier when the great catcher crashed the small airplane in which he was flying home for a short break from the pressures of Yankee baseball.
Things begin to go off the track a bit when the old man remarks just before the playing of the national anthem that, "Death need not be as final as many of us are used to believing." But it is when the two men have retaken their seats after the anthem, that the old man removes any remaining doubt about his weirdness by saying,"What would you say if I told you that it might just be possible to move time back, like a newsreel being played in reverse, and undo what has been done?"
Ah, but our narrating fan is no fool. He knows that there has to be a catch to anything with the potential to do that level of good...or evil. But, because the narrator senses that the old man is as big a baseball fan as he is, he decides to listen anyway - and will be given a chance to impact positively the greatest game of them all in a way he would never have dared dream possible even an hour earlier.
![]() |
| W.P. Kinsella |
"The Night Manny Mota Tied the Record" takes place in Dodger Stadium on August 7, 1979 during a game between the Los Angeles Dodgers and the Houston Astros. During that game, one fan, without once leaving his seat, is going to have an experience that will change him forever. An old man takes the seat next to our fan and begins talking about the funeral of Yankee catcher Thurman Munson who had died just five days earlier when the great catcher crashed the small airplane in which he was flying home for a short break from the pressures of Yankee baseball.
Things begin to go off the track a bit when the old man remarks just before the playing of the national anthem that, "Death need not be as final as many of us are used to believing." But it is when the two men have retaken their seats after the anthem, that the old man removes any remaining doubt about his weirdness by saying,"What would you say if I told you that it might just be possible to move time back, like a newsreel being played in reverse, and undo what has been done?"
Ah, but our narrating fan is no fool. He knows that there has to be a catch to anything with the potential to do that level of good...or evil. But, because the narrator senses that the old man is as big a baseball fan as he is, he decides to listen anyway - and will be given a chance to impact positively the greatest game of them all in a way he would never have dared dream possible even an hour earlier.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







