A seventeen-year-old book blog offering book reviews and news about authors, publishers, bookstores, and libraries.
Tuesday, November 24, 2020
Sunday, November 15, 2020
Books: Objects of Art vs. Reading Material
While out on an errand a couple of days ago, I made another quick stop at my local Half-Price Books. As a buyer, I've always appreciated the diverse offerings of Half-Price Books but, as a seller, there's no way I'm going to let them rip me off ever again. Anyway, it was only my third visit (second to this store) since early March - and I only allowed myself a window of 15-20 minutes inside while avoiding people as much as possible.
My desire to avoid other customers ended up with me spending more time than usual in the "nostalgia" section of the bookstore. That section is generally filled with over-priced and worn out books from the fifties and sixties, but it also includes a lot of special editions that are printed especially for collectors. Stuff from publishers like the Folio Society, The Franklin Library, Easton Press, etc. Some of the books are bound in leather, some come in slipcases, and most of them include some really wonderful illustrations on high-quality paper. They are, in fact, rather beautiful, little pieces of art.
And that leads me to my question. Do book lovers buy these limited editions only of the books they've read and admire or do they buy them more as collectible art objects? These books are generally pretty expensive, especially the ones that are signed by authors and illustrators. They can go for hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars each, especially when word gets out that a particular edition is almost sold out.
As for myself, partially because my available shelf space is nil, I can't imagine buying a book I already know deep down in my heart I won't be reading - or at least aspiring to read. But out of curiosity, I recently joined a Facebook group called "Fans of the Folio Society" because the pictures being posted there are so beautiful. The group is extremely active and friendly, and I've really enjoyed my two weeks there looking at the pictures and learning about the books and the mindset of those who love them so much.
I even came home with my first Folio Society book, one appropriately enough titled First Folio. It is a collection of the forwards to 15 of the First Folio books published in the 2000s, and a few of the forwards are written by favorites of mine such as Colm Tóibín, A.S. Byatt, Peter Ackroyd, Jonathan Coe, and Julian Barnes.It is my understanding from the group I mentioned that the book was a Folio Society giveaway to subscribers back in 2008 when it was published. And, believe it or not, I enjoy reading book forwards and never skip over them, so I do "aspire" to read this one someday. (And it helped that it only cost five dollars.)
I'm not exactly hooked on the idea of collecting this type of book, but I'm intrigued enough to consider adding a few, especially if I can find them in used-book bookstores. I own three others of the type, all three having been signed (Margaret Atwood, E.L. Doctorow, and William Styron), already and I find something especially nice about handling such high quality books every once in a while. But every one of these I would place on a shelf would mean another book being placed out of sight, and I struggle with that enough already.
So how about it? Do you collect books as objects, pieces of art, or only as reading material?
Monday, July 13, 2020
Still on the Shelf
Thursday, July 09, 2020
Straight from My Bookshelves: Feet, Trains, Boats, and Automobiles
Wednesday, April 15, 2020
Share a Bookshelf Wednesday
![]() |
Click on Image for Larger View |
I'm a little bored this morning, and that got me to thinking about one of my favorite things to do...browse bookshelves wherever and whenever I find them. I love watching television interviews of various "talking heads" mainly to freeze-frame them long enough to study the bookshelves behind them. And I love looking at pictures in magazines to do the same because you learn a whole lot about a person by checking out the titles they own and take pride in. Of course, some folks are not above "salting" their shelves in order to portray the precise image they are striving for, so the impression given is not always a true one. But it's still fun to take a look.
In that spirit, I'm sharing three of the thirty-two shelves in my study. If you enjoy browsing them, let me know and I'll share more shelves in a few days.
Tuesday, September 17, 2019
There's Still Something in the Water
![]() |
I wonder what everyone is looking at. |
Friday, April 19, 2013
Lost in the Stacks
If you're interested, here is the direct link to A Work in Progress. I've followed her "Lost in the Stacks" posts for a while now and always find them fun...loving to snoop the book collections of others, as I do. Too, if you are interested in sharing your own shelves, I imagine that Danielle would like to hear from you.
(Thanks, Danielle, it was fun.)
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
What Your Bookshelf Says About You
![]() |
A Portion of the Shelves Devoted to Old Favorites |
Many of you have admitted to the same addiction. Well, good news...now there's a website for people like us. Peter Knox and Graham Coursey have created Share Your Shelf, a site where people can post pictures of, and describe, the bookshelves in their lives. Admittedly, while there are definitely some interesting photos there, it is not quite the same as peeking over someone's shoulders who has forgotten exactly what is behind him when his picture is being snapped. Good stuff, nonetheless, so do take a look. You might even want to share your own shelves there.
![]() |
Mostly Joyce Carol Oates and Ruth Rendell, Two Favorites |
Only a bookshelf can truly hold a reader's history and future at the same time, while the present is usually found in a book bag or on a nightstand nearby. A lifelong reader myself, I've always had an obsession withseeing a person's bookshelf, to get a sense of what they've brought inside their home and their head. Bookshelves are universal in that almost everyone has one, and unique in that no two collections are the same. They reflect much more than just the book-buying habits of their owner. Titles are easy to acquire and even easier to sell off or leave behind, so if it's worthy of your shelf space, I want to know why.[...]
![]() |
And a Wide Shot Catching Most of One Wall |
A bookshelf's organisation, or lack thereof, can show that practicality and discoverability is the priority when shelved alphabetically by author (as is the traditional way). But if it's arranged by colour or trim size of the book spines, the owner obviously prizes appearance and display above finding the right title quickly. More likely the shelf is representative of how the reader sees their own collection: frequent favourites at eye level,grouped together according to genre/topic/theme and other commonalities.The article concludes with Knox's personal tips on organizing bookshelves. Over the years, I learned his tip on having "a growth strategy" the hard way...several different times, in fact. Unfortunately (or, perhaps, that should be fortunately), I have again reached the point where adding a new book to the shelves almost certainly means removing another one first. I suppose that's the best way of ensuring that my shelves reflect my reading taste most accurately - but it does make for some painful decisions.
(Feel free to snoop and comment. Just click on the pictures to see them full-sized.)