The Monster in the Box (2009) is the twenty-second book in Ruth Rendell’s twenty-four-book Inspector Wexford series. The Wexford books were published over an almost-fifty-year period (1964-2013), so there is a noticeable shift in style and character development in the Wexford books as they progress over the years. The earlier books have a bit of an old-fashioned feel to them today, and Wexford and his cohorts do not always feel particularly real. This is particularly noticeable to me, I suppose, because I have just read the fourth Wexford novel, The Best Man to Die (1969), and The Monster in the Box almost back-to-back.
As it turns out, The Monster in the Box is my favorite of the fifteen Wexford novels I have read so far. Not only does the plot involve two intriguing mysteries that need solving, one of the mysteries (because it involves a man Wexford has believed to be a murderer for decades) allows Rendell to show what kind of young policeman, and man, Wexford had been at the very beginning of his career. Much of the book involves Wexford contrasting, mainly to himself, all the cultural changes that he’s observed during his long career without, I think, realizing just how much he himself has changed over the years. And that limited self-awareness on Wexford’s part will serve as the perfect set-up for the little surprise that Rendell throws into the end of this one.
It was while investigating his very first murder case that Wexford first encountered the muscular little man wearing a scarf and walking his dog along the street outside the victim’s home. The man seemed intent on sending Wexford a message by staring so unflinchingly directly into Wexford’s eyes before he continued his walk past the home. When Wexford began running into the man so often, sometimes near the scenes of other murders, he began to feel that this Eric Targo was toying with him, almost daring him to prove Targo’s guilt if he could. And then the man disappeared.
Now, after all these years, Wexford spots Targo on the streets again, and even though he has never mentioned his suspicions to anyone before, he decides now to share his fears with his old partner, Mike Burden - who listens patiently, but just isn’t buying Wexford’s theory much at all. About the same time, Burden’s wife starts to worry that a local Pakistani family may be in the process of arranging the forced marriage of — if not even the honor killing — of Tamima, their teenaged daughter who has been seeing a boy they do not approve of. In what begins as simply a favor to his partner’s wife, Wexford assigns someone to look into what is happening in the Rahman family, but when it turns out that no one in Tamima’s extended family can account for the girl’s current whereabouts, the police start wondering if they are searching for a corpse instead of a girl who may have been forced into an unwanted marriage.
Bottom Line: The Monster in the Box ticks all the right boxes. Longtime fans of the Wexford novels are certain to enjoy such an extended look at Wexford’s early years as he reminisces about his first girlfriends and what he learned from those relationships. The two mysteries are interesting, and they come complete with all the twists and turns that mystery readers enjoy so much. Then, when the two plots begin more and more to intertwine (as they almost always do in mysteries), the climax that follows is a completely satisfying one — especially with that little surprise Rendell tosses her readers at the very end. Too, watching the Kingsmarkham police tiptoe around the Rahmans, a Muslim family, in an attempt not to offend them even while suspecting them of a possible murder, is a reminder of how difficult it is to walk the fine line of political correctness these days — and this novel was written a dozen years ago. In the end, the Rahman family was more offended by all the tiptoeing around than anything else.
Ruth Rendell |
So, if I've never read any of Rendell's Wexford mysteries, would this be a good one to read first? Because it sounds really good.
ReplyDeleteI think it would be the perfect place for a first time reader to start because you get such a good look at Wexford both as a rooking cop and as the veteran inspector he is when this one is set. The flashbacks do a great job of helping to develop the Reg Wexford character...and the plot/s in this one are great.
DeleteOh good! Even better? My library has a copy of this one. :D
DeleteLet us know what you think of it. I'm curious to see if it works as well as I think it will as a "standalone" for a new reader of the series.
DeleteI might give this one a read. I read some of the early books years and years ago and quite honestly I don't really remember much about them at all. This one sounds like it might be a good option.
ReplyDeleteThe later books, and it may be simply because I know the characters so much better now, still appeal to me more than the ones written in the sixties and seventies. I like this one a whole lot.
DeleteHi Sam, Have yet to read Ruth Rendell. I have been looking for the right book and your review of Monster in the Box tells me this might be the book to start with. P. D James another mystery writer I am ashamed to say I haven't gotten around to reading.
ReplyDeleteThis should give you a good taste of both Rendell's later style and the Wexford character, too. I've read a few P.D. James novels but still find her style a little slow to read; Rendell's earlier novels, in fact, are a lot like those of James. I hope you enjoy the book if you decide to read it.
DeleteI remember liking this one when I read it a few years ago. I am going to go back and try some of the books in this series from the 90s because I either skipped them or I have just forgotten the stories.
ReplyDeleteMy next one of hers will probably be one she wrote as Barbara Vine. I picked up "The Child's Child" from the library a few days ago, but I have six weeks to read or return it, so it will be a while.
Delete